Fine Foliage of Florida, Inc. v. King Ocean Services Limited, Inc. et al

Plaintiff: Fine Foliage of Florida, Inc.
Defendant: King Ocean Services Limited, Inc. and Martainer, Inc.
Case Number: 6:2008cv01683
Filed: September 30, 2008
Court: Florida Middle District Court
Office: Marine Product Liability Office
County: Volusia
Referring Judge: David A. Baker
Presiding Judge: Unassigned Judge ORL
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 49:81 Damaged Goods While Being Transported

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fine Foliage of Florida, Inc. v. King Ocean Services Limited, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Fine Foliage of Florida, Inc.
Represented By: J. W. Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: King Ocean Services Limited, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Martainer, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.