Williams v. United States of America et al
| David Williams |
| United States of America, Department of the Navy and Norm Livingston |
| 6:2008cv01771 |
| October 14, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| Seminole |
| Gregory J. Kelly |
| Gregory A. Presnell |
| Plaintiff |
| U.S. Government Defendant |
| 28:1346 Tort Claim |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
46
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 35 Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant Livingston is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law on Plaintiff's Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment claims in Count VII of the Complaint. The Court will bifurcate Plaintiff's Bivens and FTCA claims. The Court's ruling on the Government's Motion as to Counts I and III is DEFERRED. Trial term begins at 9:00 a.m. on June 1, 2010. Signed by Judge Gregory A. Presnell on 4/2/2010. (TFF)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER granting 26 Motion to Dismiss or, alternatively, Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Plaintiff's First Amendment Claim is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Gregory A. Presnell on 9/29/2009. (TFF)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER granting 9 Motion to dismiss. Counts IV, V, and VI are hereby dismissed with prejudice. Count II is dismissed without prejudice. The Department of the Navy is dismissed as a party to this suit. Signed by Judge Gregory A. Presnell on 1/28/2009. (TFF)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
