Andriello v. CFI Sales & Marketing, Inc. et al
| Celia Andriello |
| CFI Sales & Marketing, Inc., Central Florida Investments, Inc. and Westgate Resorts, Inc. |
| 6:2009cv00208 |
| February 3, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Labor: Fair Standards Office |
| Orange |
| Gregory J. Kelly |
| G. Kendall Sharp |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 29:201 Denial of Overtime Compensation |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
348
ORDER adopting 340 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge to the extent it recommends an award to Plaintiffs of $14,487.15 in attorneys' fees. However, upon receipt of supplemental documentation, the Court will award addition al costs for scanning and printing to Plaintiffs. Plaintiff Celia Andriello et al.'s Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs 329 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiffs are awarded attorneys' fees in the amount of $14,4 87.15. Plaintiffs are awarded costs in the amount of $11,123.25, representing $3,496.50, as recommended by the Magistrate, plus $7,626.75, based upon Plaintiffs' supplemental documentation. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiffs as to attorneys' fees and costs in the total amount of $25,610.40. The Clerk is further directed to CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 8/10/2012. (BGS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
