Skyplan Services Limited v. Diaoune and Brothers, Inc.

Justia Dockets & Filings Eleventh Circuit Florida Middle District Skyplan Services Limited v. Diaoune and Brothers, Inc.

Skyplan Services Limited v. Diaoune and Brothers, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Skyplan Services Limited
Defendant:	Diaoune and Brothers, Inc.
Case Number:	6:2009cv01465
Filed:	August 26, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office:	Orlando Office
County:	Volusia
Presiding Judge:	John Antoon II
Presiding Judge:	Gregory J. Kelly
Nature of Suit:	Plaintiff
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 1, 2012	Filing 29 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 28 Report and Recommendations. Plaintiff is awarded one hundred and fifty dollars ($150.00) for drafting and filing the March 16, 2012, motion for contempt. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant in the amount of $150.00. Signed by Judge John Antoon II on 6/1/2012. (DJD)
April 9, 2010	Filing 12 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 10 Motion for judgment; Adopting Report and Recommendations re 11 Report and Recommendations. Final judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant, Diaoune and Brothers, Inc., in the t otal amount of $88,382.53 ($86,242.68 in principal; $1,724.85 as 2% penalty; and $415.00 in costs). Plaintiff is awarded post-judgment interest at the rate allowed by law. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment as set forth above and to thereafter close the file. Signed by Judge John Antoon II on 4/9/2010. (DJD)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 1, 2012

Filing 29 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 28 Report and Recommendations. Plaintiff is awarded one hundred and fifty dollars ($150.00) for drafting and filing the March 16, 2012, motion for contempt. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant in the amount of $150.00. Signed by Judge John Antoon II on 6/1/2012. (DJD)

April 9, 2010

Filing 12 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 10 Motion for judgment; Adopting Report and Recommendations re 11 Report and Recommendations. Final judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant, Diaoune and Brothers, Inc., in the t otal amount of $88,382.53 ($86,242.68 in principal; $1,724.85 as 2% penalty; and $415.00 in costs). Plaintiff is awarded post-judgment interest at the rate allowed by law. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment as set forth above and to thereafter close the file. Signed by Judge John Antoon II on 4/9/2010. (DJD)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Skyplan Services Limited v. Diaoune and Brothers, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Skyplan Services Limited
Represented By:	Dennis A. Creed, III
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Diaoune and Brothers, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?