PNC Bank, N.A. v. Melbourne Surplus Building Supplies, Inc. et al

Defendant: Karen Cormier and Melbourne Surplus Building Supplies, Inc.
Plaintiff: PNC Bank, N.A.
Case Number: 6:2013cv00504
Filed: March 27, 2013
Court: Florida Middle District Court
Office: Orlando Office
County: XX Outside US
Presiding Judge: Gregory A. Presnell
Referring Judge: Thomas B. Smith
Nature of Suit: Negotiable Instrument
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Jury Demanded By: None

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PNC Bank, N.A. v. Melbourne Surplus Building Supplies, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Karen Cormier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Melbourne Surplus Building Supplies, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: PNC Bank, N.A.
Represented By: Kristi Neher Davisson
Represented By: John A. Anthony
Represented By: John M. Stratton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.