Martinez v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Edward Marcelino Martinez
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: SSA
Case Number: 6:2019cv02394
Filed: December 20, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Embry J Kidd
Referring Judge: Monte C Richardson
2 Judge: G Kendall Sharp
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 PROOF of service as to Office of General Counsel/Commissioner of Social Security executed on 01/07/2020 by Edward Marcelino Martinez (Boyd, Bradley) Modified on 1/29/2020 (SPM).
January 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 SUMMONS returned executed by Edward Marcelino Martinez. Commissioner of Social Security served on 1/6/2020, answer due 3/6/2020. (Boyd, Bradley)
January 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Case Reassigned to Magistrate Judge Monte C. Richardson. New case number: 6:19-cv-2394-Orl-18MCR. Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd no longer assigned to the case. (SMS)
January 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #3 Related case order and track 1 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Edward Marcelino Martinez. Related case(s): no (Boyd, Bradley)
December 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 SUMMONS issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (SPM)
December 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER requiring electronic filing of the administrative record in Social Security cases (See 6:10-mc-95-ORL-22, Doc. 1) Signed by Judge Anne C. Conway on 7/23/2010. (SPM)
December 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1. Notice of pendency of other actions due within 14 days from the date of this order. Signed by Senior Judge G. Kendall Sharp on 12/20/2019. (counsel emailed)(AKC)
December 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Senior Judge G. Kendall Sharp and Magistrate Judge Embry J. Kidd. New case number: 6:19-cv-2394-Orl-18EJK. (SJB)
December 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-16279246) filed by Edward Marcelino Martinez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons US Attorney, #3 Proposed Summons OGC, #4 Proposed Summons Attorney General)(Boyd, Bradley) Modified on 12/20/2019 (SPM).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Martinez v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Edward Marcelino Martinez
Represented By: Bradley K. Boyd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?