Snyder v. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Petitioner: Richard Thomas Snyder
Interested Party: SSA
Case Number: 6:2020cv01275
Filed: July 19, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Daniel C Irick
Referring Judge: G Kendall Sharp
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 PROOF of service as to Office of Regional Counsel and US Attorney General by Richard Thomas Snyder (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service for US Attorney General)(Boyd, Bradley) Modified on 8/24/2020 (ARJ).
August 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 SUMMONS returned executed by Richard Thomas Snyder. Commissioner of Social Security served on 7/27/2020, answer due 9/25/2020. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Office of General Counsel, #2 Supplement Attorney General)(Boyd, Bradley)
July 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #3 Related case order and track 1 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Richard Thomas Snyder. Related case(s): no (Boyd, Bradley)
July 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER requiring electronic filing of the administrative record in Social Security cases (See 6:10-mc-95-ORL-22, Doc. 1). Signed by Judge Anne C. Conway on 7/23/2010. (MAA)
July 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 SUMMONS issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (ARJ)
July 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1. Notice of pendency of other actions due within 14 days from the date of this order. Signed by Senior Judge G. Kendall Sharp on 7/20/2020. (counsel emailed)(AKC)
July 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Senior Judge G. Kendall Sharp and Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick. New case number: 6:20-cv-1275-Orl-18DCI. (SJB)
July 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew M Saul, Commissioner of Social Security (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-17073140) filed by Richard Thomas Snyder. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons US Attorney, #3 Proposed Summons Office of General Counsel, #4 Proposed Summons Attorney General)(Boyd, Bradley)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Snyder v. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Richard Thomas Snyder
Represented By: Bradley K. Boyd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?