Tripro Consulting, LLC v. CACI, Inc. - Federal
| Tripro Consulting, LLC |
| CACI, Inc. - Federal |
| 6:2023cv00568 |
| March 28, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Daniel C Irick |
| Carlos E Mendoza |
| Contract: Recovery/Enforcement |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ANSWER and affirmative defenses to #1 Complaint, by CACI, Inc. - Federal.(Ashby, Kimberly)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Tripro Consulting, LLC. Related case(s): No (El-Gendi, Ahmad)
|
|
Filing 8
CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Tripro Consulting, LLC. (El-Gendi, Ahmad)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE TO COUNSEL AND PARTIES: The Orlando Division of the Middle District of Florida is currently operating in a Judicial Emergency due to a judicial vacancy and the number of cases in the division. Accordingly, civil cases, and especially newly filed civil cases, will be the Court's lowest priority unless emergency issues are presented. Counsel and the parties are encouraged to consider consenting to the Magistrate Judge for the entire case or disposition of any dispositive motions in order to have their case considered on a more timely basis. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 4/3/2023. (MEH)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE TO COUNSEL AND PARTIES: Failure to comply with ANY Local Rules or Court Orders may result in the imposition of sanctions including, but not limited to, the dismissal of this action or entry of default without further notice. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 3/30/2023. (MEH)
|
|
Filing 5
INITIAL ORDER re: Case Management and Deadlines. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 3/30/2023. (MEH)
|
|
Filing 4
SUMMONS issued as to CACI, Inc. - Federal. (SPM)
|
|
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER ON DISCOVERY MOTIONS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick on 1/2/2020. (ECJ)
|
|
Filing 2
NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Carlos E. Mendoza and Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick. New case number: 6:23-cv-00568-CEM-DCI. (ER)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against CACI, Inc. - Federal with Jury Demand (Filing fee $402 receipt number AFLMDC-20661310) filed by Tripro Consulting, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Proposed Summons)(El-Gendi, Ahmad) Modified on 3/30/2023 (SPM).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Tripro Consulting, LLC v. CACI, Inc. - Federal | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tripro Consulting, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Ahmad Saad El-Gendi |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: CACI, Inc. - Federal | |
| Represented By: | Kimberly Ann Ashby |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
