Southern Family Insurance Company v. United States of America
Case Number: 8:2005cv02158
Filed: November 23, 2005
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office: Tampa Office
Presiding Judge: Richard A. Lazzara
Presiding Judge: Mark A. Pizzo
Nature of Suit: Taxes
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 Recovery of IRS Tax
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 18, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 391 FINAL JUDGMENT. See Order for details. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the case. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 3/18/2011. (SMB)
February 25, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 384 ORDER granting 381 Emergency Motion to Compel Depositions. (See Order for details.) Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 2/25/2011. (LN)
January 20, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 372 ORDER: Poe's Motion for Reimbursement of Its Attorneys' Fees and Non-Taxable Costs 360 is DENIED without prejudice as premature. USA's Motion to Alter Judgment 363 is DENIED without prejudice as premature. Southern's Amended Motion for Extension of Time 369 is DENIED as moot. The parties shall advise the Court by January 27, 2011, as to when they would like to proceed to trial on the remaining issue. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 1/20/2011. (LN)
December 1, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 358 PARTIAL FINAL JUDGMENT: The CLERK is directed to enter Partial Final Judgment in favor of Plaintiffs and against Defendant as set forth in this Order. This case shall remain open to determine the issue of ownership (between the Plaintiffs) of the tax refunds, and the amount of the refund and any NOL carryforwards due for each year. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 12/1/2010. (LN)
July 26, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 289 ORDER: Partial summary judgment is GRANTED in favor of Plaintiffs and against Defendant on the issue of timing. The Court holds, as a matter of law, that the takeout bonuses and the interest earned on the amounts were not attributable as income to Southern Family until they were released to Southern Family. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 7/26/2010. (LN)
July 14, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 283 ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion to Bifurcate Trial and Clarify Case Scheduling Order 282 is GRANTED IN PART. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 7/14/2010. (LN)
April 26, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 245 ORDER: Defendant's Motion to Strike Expert Report of James W. Newman, Jr. and to Strike Paragraphs 14-17 of His Affidavit 233 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Paragraphs 15, 16, and 17 are stricken from the affidavit of James W. Newman, Jr. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 4/26/2010. (LN)
February 26, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 141 ORDER: Southern Family's Motion for Reconsideration 114 is DENIED. Southern Family's oral motion to amend its Complaint is GRANTED. Southern Family has 20 days to amend its Complaint. Plaintiff's Alternative Motion for Order Allowi ng Interlocutory Appeal Should its Motion for Reconsideration of the Order of Dismissal be Denied 137 is DENIED. Southern Family's Motion to Enlarge Time Periods Provided in Case Management and Scheduling Order and Permit Discovery 116 is GRANTED. The parties are directed to file a revised Case Management Report within 30 days of the date Southern Family amends its Complaint. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 2/26/2009. (LN)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Southern Family Insurance Company v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?