Terhune v. Potter
Plaintiff: Christopher Terhune
Defendant: John E. Potter
Case Number: 8:2008cv01218
Filed: June 25, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: Pinellas
Presiding Judge: Steven D. Merryday
Presiding Judge: Mark A. Pizzo
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 42:2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 31, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER granting 27 --motion for summary judgment; directing the Clerk to ENTER JUDGMENT in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiff on each count of the amended complaint; TERMINATE any pending motion, and CLOSE the case. Signed by Judge Steven D. Merryday on 7/31/2009. (BK)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Terhune v. Potter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John E. Potter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher Terhune
Represented By: Nicholas E. Karatinos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?