Lane-Gardner v. City of Tampa et al
Plaintiff: Tamika Lane-Gardner
Defendant: City of Tampa, Stephen Hogue and Larry McKinnon
Case Number: 8:2008cv01414
Filed: July 23, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office: Civil Rights: Other Office
County: Hillsborough
Presiding Judge: Elizabeth A. Jenkins
Presiding Judge: Elizabeth A. Kovachevich
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 20, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 43 Motion to dismiss. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 42 U.S.C § 1983 against Defendant, City of Tampa (Count I ), is DENIED, and Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff 42 U.S.C § 1983 against Defendant, City of Tampa (Count II ), is GRANTED with prejudice. This case may go forward only as to Count I of the Third Amended Complaint. The Defendant shall answer the remaining Count within (10) days of this order. Signed by Judge Elizabeth A. Kovachevich on 10/20/2009. (SN)
June 11, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER finding as moot 35 Motion for leave to file; finding as moot 27 Motion to dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 35 Motion for leave to file third amended complaint. See order for details. The amended complaint shall be filed within 10 days of this date. Signed by Judge Elizabeth A. Kovachevich on 6/11/2009. (SN)
February 18, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 12 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Defendant, City of Tampa (Counts I, II, and III), is GRANTED, and Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs state law claims in Count IV against Defendant, Larry McK innon, is GRANTED with prejudice. Plaintiff shall have ten (10) days to cure all other noted deficiencies and file a Second Amended Complaint or those claims will be dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Elizabeth A. Kovachevich on 2/18/2009. (SN)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lane-Gardner v. City of Tampa et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tamika Lane-Gardner
Represented By: Joseph H. Varner, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Tampa
Represented By: Ursula Danese Richardson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stephen Hogue
Represented By: Ursula Danese Richardson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Larry McKinnon
Represented By: Ursula Danese Richardson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?