Williams v. United States Department of the Treasury et al
Joseph Arthur Williams |
United States Department of the Treasury and Henry M. Paulson, Jr. |
8:2008cv02448 |
December 11, 2008 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Civil Rights: Jobs Office |
Hillsborough |
Virginia M. Hernandez Covington |
Elizabeth A. Jenkins |
Plaintiff |
U.S. Government Defendant |
42:2003 Job Discrimination |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 38 ORDER denying 30 Plaintiff's Motion to Supplement Complaint; denying 31 Plaintiff's Motion to Add Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Office of Federal Operations, as an Indispensable Party ; denying 32 Plaintiff's Motion t o Join; denying as moot 34 Plaintiff's Motion to Join Related Case; denying 6 Plaintiff's Motion for Continuance; granting 12 Defendants' Dispositive Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint; denying 17 Plaintiff 39;s Motion to Amend; denying 17 Plaintiff's Motion to Add Indispensable Parties; granting 21 Defendants' Motion to Strike Reply; denying 26 Plaintiff's Motion for Injunction. The Clerk is directed to strike 20 Plaintiff's Reply and to close this case. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 3/31/2010. (CR) |
Filing 23 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 7 Plaintiff's Petition for Writ of Mandamus. The undersigned recommends that Plaintiff's petition be denied. See report and recommendation for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Jenkins on 9/9/2009. (ACS) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.