Perez v. Holt et al
Ralph Xavier Perez |
Officer Holt, John Doe #1, Officer Cooper, Officer Yi, Officer Smith, John Doe #2 and John Doe #3 |
8:2009cv00261 |
February 13, 2009 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
Hamilton |
Virginia M. Hernandez Covington |
Mark A. Pizzo |
None |
Federal Question |
42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 91 ORDER granting 87 Plaintiff's Motion to grant a jury trial for the remaining excessive use of force claim. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 7/16/2010. (SM) |
Filing 73 ORDER denying 60 Defendants' Motion for summary judgment. On or before May 20, 2010, Plaintiff shall provide a telephone number at which he can be reached from the pretrial conference scheduled for June 10, 2010 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 14B of the Sam Gibbons Courthouse, Tampa, Florida. If the telephone number changes, Plaintiff shall be responsible for updating the telephone number. The parties shall file their pretrial narrative statements on or before June 3, 2010. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 5/4/2010. (SM) |
Filing 43 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 27 Defendants' Motion to dismiss Plaintiff's civil rights complaint. See order for details. Defendants shall file their answer within 10 days of the date of this order. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 9/15/2009. (SM) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.