Intabill, Inc. v. Elie
Plaintiff: Intabill, Inc.
Defendant: Chad Edward Elie
Case Number: 8:2009cv00834
Filed: May 1, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office: Tampa Office
County: Pinellas
Presiding Judge: Steven D. Merryday
Presiding Judge: Thomas G. Wilson
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Conversion
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 29, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 29 --motion to dismiss; granting to the extent that Count 1 is dismissed with prejudice. Otherwise the motion is denied. Answer to remainder of the amended complaint is due 10/16/2009. Signed by Judge Steven D. Merryday on 9/29/2009. (BK)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Intabill, Inc. v. Elie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Intabill, Inc.
Represented By: David Barnett Weinstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chad Edward Elie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?