Whitney National Bank v. R&S Development of SW FL, LLC et al
| Whitney National Bank |
| R&S Development of SW FL, LLC, Sandalwood Buisness Park, LLC, Brit E. Svoboda and Mark K. Rasmus |
| 8:2009cv02315 |
| November 12, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Tampa Office |
| Lee |
| James S. Moody |
| Thomas G. Wilson |
| None |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 fd Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
ORDER: The Clerk is directed to enter a JUDGMENT FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES in favor of Plaintiff, Whitney National Bank, and against Defendants, R&S Development of SW FL, LLC, Sandalwood Business Park, LLC, Brit E. Svoboda, and Mark K. Rasmus, in the amount of $17,718.02. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 7/12/2010. (LN)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Final Judgment 16 is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to enter final judgment in favor of Plaintiff Whitney National Bank and against Defendants R&S Development of SW FL, LLC, Sandalwood Business Park, LLC , Brit E. Svoboda, and Mark Rasmus in the total amount of $4,008,703.16. Plaintiff's attorney shall submit an attorney's fee and costs affidavit with supporting time records and documentation within 20 days. The Clerk shall close this file. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 6/14/2010. (LN)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
