Davis v. Tampa Bay Arena, Ltd
| G. Mitchell Davis |
| Tampa Bay Arena, Ltd |
| 8:2012cv00060 |
| January 11, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Tampa Office |
| Hillsborough |
| Mark A. Pizzo |
| James S. Moody |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
129
ORDER: The Clerk of Court is directed to enter a judgment in the amount of $16,975.53 in Defendant's favor and against Plaintiff for costs. This case shall remain closed. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 10/28/2013. (LN)
|
|
Filing
128
ORDER denying 126 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 10/23/2013. (LN)
|
|
Filing
115
ORDER: Defendant's Verified Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs 104 is denied with respect to fees and granted with respect to Defendant's entitlement to costs. The Court reserves jurisdiction on the amount of the cost award. Defendant's Motion for Leave to File a Reply 113 is denied as moot. This case shall remain closed. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 8/16/2013. (LN)
|
|
Filing
102
JUDGMENT in favor of Tampa Bay Arena, Ltd against G. Mitchell Davis Signed by Deputy Clerk on 6/28/2013. (JNB)
|
|
Filing
101
ORDER: Defendant's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 86 is granted in part and denied in part. The motion is granted to the extent that the Court grants summary judgment in Defendant's favor on Plaintiff's copyright infringement claim (Count I of Plaintiff's amended complaint). The motion is denied with respect to Plaintiff's breach of bailment, conversion, and replevin claims. The Clerk is directed to enter final judgment in Defendant's favor and against P laintiff solely on Plaintiff's copyright infringement claim (Count I of Plaintiff's amended complaint). After entering final judgment, the Clerk is directed to REMAND this case to the Circuit Court of the Thirteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Hillsborough County, Florida, and provide that court with a copy of this Order. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case and terminate any pending motions as moot. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 6/27/2013. (LN)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER: Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint {20] is granted in part and denied in part. Defendant shall file an answer to the amended complaint within 14 days. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 6/11/2012. (LN)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Davis v. Tampa Bay Arena, Ltd | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Tampa Bay Arena, Ltd | |
| Represented By: | Patrick M. Chidnese |
| Represented By: | Justin L. Dees |
| Represented By: | Natalie P. Thomas |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: G. Mitchell Davis | |
| Represented By: | James A. Wardell |
| Represented By: | Brent Alan Gordon |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
