Alvarez v. USA

Plaintiff: Rolando Coca Alvarez
Defendant: USA
Case Number: 8:2013cv00766
Filed: March 25, 2013
Court: Florida Middle District Court
Office: Tampa Office
County: Hillsborough
Presiding Judge: Susan C Bucklew
Referring Judge: Anthony E. Porcelli
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28:2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 10, 2013 10 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER denying 1 Motion to vacate/set aside/correct sentence (2255). The Clerk is directed to enter judgment for the United States and close the civil case. Signed by Judge Susan C Bucklew on 10/10/2013. (GMS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Alvarez v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rolando Coca Alvarez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: USA
Represented By: Josephine W. Thomas
Represented By: Stacie B. Harris
Represented By: I. Randall Gold
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.