Munch v. Credit Protection Association, LP et al
| William Munch |
| Credit Protection Association, LP and Comcast of Tallahassee, LLC |
| 8:2013cv01179 |
| May 2, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Tampa Office |
| Hillsborough |
| Elizabeth A. Kovachevich |
| Thomas G. Wilson |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
66
ORDER adopting 63 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 62 MOTION for Taxation of Costs For Supplemental Work In Support of Report and Recommendation of Attorney Fees filed by William Munch., denying Motion. Signed by Judge Elizabeth A. Kovachevich on 3/31/2015. (JM)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER granting 52 Defendant Comcast's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Plaintiff may file a second amended complaint before 5:00pm on March 27, 2015. See Order for further details. Signed by Judge Elizabeth A. Kovachevich on 3/18/2015. (rjm)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER Adopting in Part 55 Report and Recommendations; Granting in Part Plaintiff's 28 Motion for Attorney Fees. The Court adopts the entirety of the Report and Recommendations with the exception of the determination of fees for attorney-client communications, and reduces that portion of the fees to the equivalent of 8.8 hours at $350 per hour. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Elizabeth A. Kovachevich on 9/24/2014. (rjm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
