Carlo Bay Enterprise, Inc v. Two Amigo Restaurant, Inc et al
Carlo Bay Enterprise, Inc |
William Lopez, Two Amigo Restaurant, Inc and Phillip Lopez |
8:2014cv01989 |
August 18, 2014 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Tampa Office |
Hillsborough |
Virginia M. Hernandez Covington |
Thomas G. Wilson |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 24 ORDER: Plaintiff Carlo Bay Enterprise, Inc.'s Motion for Award of Attorneys' Fees and Non-Taxable Expenses 21 is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Proposed Bill of Costs 22 is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE THIS CASE. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 1/5/2015. (KBT) |
Filing 19 ORDER: Plaintiff Carlo Bay Enterprise, Inc.'s Motion for Entry of Default Judgment Against Defendants Phillip Lopez, William Lopez, and Two Amigo Restaurant, Inc. 18 is GRANTED to the extent set forth herein. The Clerk is directed to enter Ju dgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendants Phillip Lopez, William Lopez, and Two Amigo Restaurant, Inc., in the amount of $30,000. If Plaintiff intends to file a motion for attorney fees in this matter, Plaintiff is directed to do so on or before December 22, 2014. Any such motion must be accompanied by a detailed fee ledger itemizing the hours worked in this case. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 12/8/2014. (KBT) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.