O'Hara et al v. Princeco, Inc.
| Mark W. Summerford and Nathaniel O'Hara |
| Princeco, Inc. doing business as Scott's One Hour Air Conditioning & Heating |
| 8:2014cv03041 |
| December 5, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Tampa Office |
| Hillsborough |
| Susan C Bucklew |
| Elizabeth A Jenkins |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. § 201 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 18, 2015. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 20
ENDORSED ORDER re Stipulation #19: This case is dismissed with prejudice, and the Clerk is directed to close the case. Signed by Judge Susan C Bucklew on 6/18/15. (JD)
|
| Filing 19 STIPULATION of Dismissal (Joint) by Nathaniel O'Hara, Mark W. Summerford. (Cabassa, Luis) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE of mediation conference/hearing to be held on 7/9/15 10:00 am before Mark A. Hanley. (Cabassa, Luis) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE by Princeco, Inc. of Conflict of Trial (Rubenstein, Brian) |
|
Filing 16
CASE MANAGEMENT AND SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 10/1/2015, Dispositive motions due by 11/2/2015, Pretrial Conference set for 2/10/2016 at 08:30 AM in Tampa Courtroom 15 B before Judge Susan C Bucklew, Conduct mediation hearing by 10/13/2015. This case is set for a jury trial on the Court's March 2016 trial calendar. Signed by Judge Susan C Bucklew on 4/6/2015. (JD)
|
| Filing 15 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re 13 Order no pdf filed by Nathaniel O'Hara, Mark W. Summerford. (Cabassa, Luis) |
| Filing 14 CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT. (Rubenstein, Brian) |
|
Filing 13
ENDORSED ORDER that Plaintiff is directed to show cause by a written response filed on or before 4/2/15 why this case should not be dismissed pursuant to Local Rule 3.10 for lack of prosecution due to the non-filing of a Case Management Report within the time prescribed by Local Rule 3.05. Failure to respond shall result in this action being dismissed without further notice. Signed by Judge Susan C Bucklew on 3/26/2015. (JD)
|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of compliance with Court's Additional Procedures for FLSA Cases by Princeco, Inc. (Rubenstein, Brian) |
|
Filing 11
ENDORSED ORDER granting #10 Motion to extend time to meet and confer. Signed by Judge Susan C Bucklew on 3/3/2015. (JD)
|
| Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION to extend time to Meet and Confer In Person Pursuant to Court's FLSA Scheduling Order by Princeco, Inc.. (Rubenstein, Brian) |
| Filing 9 VERIFIED summary by Princeco, Inc.. (Rubenstein, Brian) |
| Filing 8 VERIFIED summary by Princeco, Inc.. (Rubenstein, Brian) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to court interrogatories re: #4 FLSA scheduling order by Mark W. Summerford. (Cabassa, Luis) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to court interrogatories re: #4 FLSA scheduling order by Nathaniel O'Hara. (Cabassa, Luis) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to #2 Complaint with Jury Demand by Princeco, Inc..(Rubenstein, Brian) |
|
Filing 4
FLSA SCHEDULING ORDER. Signed by Judge Susan C Bucklew on 12/22/2014. (MSS)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - Track 2 (MSS) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Princeco, Inc. with Jury Demand filed by Nathaniel O'Hara, Mark W. Summerford in State Court on 11/03/2014.(RFK) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from the 13th Judicial Circuit, in and for Hillsborough County, Florida, case number 14-CA-011052 filed in State Court on 11/03/2014. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number TPA-27226 filed by Princeco, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Record, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(RFK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
