Peacock v. CCMC F&B, LLC et al
| D'Andre Peacock |
| CCMC F&B, LLC and Beef 'O Brady's, Inc. |
| 8:2015cv00378 |
| February 23, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Tampa Office |
| Hillsborough |
| Charlene Edwards Honeywell |
| Mark A. Pizzo |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
56
ORDER adopting 55 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. (1) The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted, confirmed, and approved in all respects and is made a part of this Order for all purposes, including ap pellate review. (2) Plaintiff's Motion Requesting Status Conference and to Re-Open Case and For Sanctions 51 is GRANTED. (3) The Clerk is directed to reopen the case. (4) Sanctions in the amount of $1,000 are hereby assessed against CCMC's counsel, Mercedes Hale, Esq. Ms. Hale is directed to pay the sanctions to Plaintiff and his counsel on or before May 31, 2016. Ms. Hale is directed to confirm the payment by filing a notice of payment with the Court. If payment is not made by May 31, 2016, Plaintiff shall be entitled to a judgment, upon which execution shall issue. (5) An Order To Show Cause will issue by separate order of the Court. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 4/25/2016. (BGS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
