Pemberton v. Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.
Diane Pemberton |
Kohl's Department Stores, Inc. |
8:2015cv01037 |
April 30, 2015 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Tampa Office |
Hillsborough |
Elizabeth A Kovachevich |
Anthony E Porcelli |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2015. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ENDORSED ORDER dismissing case pursuant to #11 Notice of voluntary dismissal. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case and to terminate any pending motions. Signed by Judge Elizabeth A. Kovachevich on 7/22/2015. (SN) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of voluntary dismissal by Diane Pemberton (Hill, Brandon) |
Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint (with Incorporated Memorandum of Law) by Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.. (Shaughnessy, Kevin) |
Filing 9 ENDORSED ORDER denying as moot #7 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; denying as moot #7 Motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction as an amended complaint has been filed. The defendant shall respond to the amended complaint in a timely manner. Signed by Judge Elizabeth A. Kovachevich on 7/6/2015. (SN) |
Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Kohl's Department Stores, Inc. with Jury Demand. filed by Diane Pemberton. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Hill, Brandon) |
Filing 7 MOTION to dismiss for failure to state a claim (with Incorporated Memorandum of Law), MOTION to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction (with Incorporated Memorandum of Law) by Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - FCRA Disclosure and Authorization)(Shaughnessy, Kevin) |
Filing 6 ENDORSED ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Responsive pleading due on or before 6/15/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli on 5/21/2015. (JMF) |
Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint Until June 15, 2015 by Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.. (Shaughnessy, Kevin) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli. |
Filing 4 RETURN of service executed on May 4, 2015 by Diane Pemberton as to Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.. (Hill, Brandon) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - Track 2 (CLM) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS issued as to Kohl's Department Stores, Inc. (DG) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kohl's Department Stores, Inc. with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number TPA-29850) filed by Diane Pemberton. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(DG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Pemberton v. Kohl's Department Stores, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Diane Pemberton | |
Represented By: | Brandon J. Hill |
Represented By: | Luis A. Cabassa |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Kohl's Department Stores, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Kevin W. Shaughnessy |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.