Nance v. Commissioner of Social Security
| JACQUELINE NICHET NANCE |
| ANDREW M. SAUL and Commissioner of Social Security |
| SSA |
| 8:2020cv00507 |
| March 4, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Nicholas P Mizell |
| Julie S Sneed |
| James D Whittemore |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge James D. Whittemore and Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed. New case number: 8:20-cv-507-T-27JSS. Motion(s) REFERRED: #2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency . Motion(s) referred to Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed. (SJB)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by JACQUELINE NICHET NANCE. (Attachments: #1 U.S. Marshal's form - Office of the General Counsel, Atlanta, #2 U.S. Marshal's form - U.S. Attorney's office, Tampac, #3 U.S. Marshal's form - Attorney General of the United States)(Bohr, Sarah)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against ANDREW M. SAUL filed by JACQUELINE NICHET NANCE. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons Proposed summons - Office of the General Counsel, Atlanta, #3 Proposed summons - U..S. Attorney's Office, Tampa, #4 Proposed summons - Attorney General of the United States)(Bohr, Sarah)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
