Vila Rodriguez v. United States of America
United States of America |
Amarylis Vila Rodriguez and Tampa Family Health Centers, Inc. |
8:2021cv01323 |
June 1, 2021 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Kathryn K Mizelle |
Christopher P Tuite |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2671 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 SUMMONS issued as to United States of America, U.S. Attorney. (JLD) |
Filing 6 PROPOSED summons to be issued by Amarylis Vila Rodriguez. (Fernandez, Adam) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Jacqueline A.R. Root on behalf of Tampa Family Health Centers, Inc. (Root, Jacqueline) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Intervene by Tampa Family Health Centers, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Carbone, Edward) Modified text on 7/1/2021 (JLD). |
Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to United States of America. (CRH) |
Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Kathryn K. Mizelle and Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite. New case number: 8:21-cv-1323-KKM-CPT. (SJB) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against United States of America filed by Amarylis Vila Rodriguez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E, #8 Exhibit F, #9 Exhibit G, #10 Exhibit H)(Receipt Number: AFLMDC-18312529) (Fernandez, Adam) Modified on 6/9/2021 to reflect payment (CRH). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.