LANGILLE v. HOFER
Plaintiff: DEANNA LANGILLE
Defendant: JAY HOFER, MIRIAM DILLARD, COMMISSIONER and EDWARD SUARZ
Case Number: 1:2012cv00127
Filed: June 13, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Office: Gainesville Office
County: Alachua
Presiding Judge: GARY R JONES
Presiding Judge: MAURICE M PAUL
Nature of Suit: Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant)
Cause of Action: 26 U.S.C. ยง 7426
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 4, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER denying Plaintiff's 24 Motion to Amend and 25 Motion for Declaratory Judgment. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 3/4/2013. (jws)
February 21, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER denying 21 Motion for Reconsideration, denying 22 MOTION to Amend Response to Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint by DEANNA LANGILLE. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 2/21/2013. (jws)
February 13, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER ADOPTING 15 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Government's 6 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED and this case is DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. Plaintiff's 11 , 16 Motions to Amend are DENIED. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 2/13/2013. (jws)
September 27, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER denying 9 Motion for TRO. Plaintiff's request to seal affidavit in support of TRO is GRANTED. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES on 9/27/2012. (jws)
June 22, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER AND NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF: Clerk shall forward Plaintiff a copy of Fed.Civ.P.4 and two blank summons forms. If summons returned, Clerk directed to issue all summonses w/21 days for Defendant SUARZ and 60 days for remaining Defe ndants. Plaintiff shall provide the Court with certification of service. (Summons returned for Issuance by 7/12/2012. Certification of Service Deadline by 10/11/2012. Notify Chambers on 10/12/2012.). Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES on 6/22/2012. (jws)(Summons & Rule 4 to Pla.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LANGILLE v. HOFER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DEANNA LANGILLE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JAY HOFER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MIRIAM DILLARD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: COMMISSIONER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: EDWARD SUARZ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?