DUCK v. ROLAR INC
Plaintiff: DARREN DUCK
Defendant: ROLAR INC
Case Number: 1:2012cv00140
Filed: June 28, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Office: Gainesville Office
County: Gilchrist
Presiding Judge: GARY R JONES
Presiding Judge: STEPHAN P MICKLE
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Education
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 21, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER: 16 Second MOTION to Extend Timeto Respond to Plaintiff's Discovery Requests (unopposed) filed by ROLAR INC is GRANTED. Defendant must respond to Plaintiff's discovery requests by 9/3/2012. All other deadlines shall remain the same. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES on 8/21/2012. (jws)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DUCK v. ROLAR INC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ROLAR INC
Represented By: PAUL ANDREW DONNELLY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DARREN DUCK
Represented By: JENNIFER KATE BIRMINGHAM
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?