SHAFFER v. COLVIN

SHAFFER v. COLVIN

Plaintiff:	WILLIAM LEE SHAFFER
Defendant:	CAROLYN COLVIN
Case Number:	1:2013cv00257
Filed:	December 20, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Office:	Gainesville Office
County:	Alachua
Presiding Judge:	STEPHAN P MICKLE
Presiding Judge:	CHARLES A STAMPELOS
Nature of Suit:	Health Insurance
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 416
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 20, 2015	Filing 27 ORDER ADOPTING 26 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - Decision of the Commissioner, denying benefits, is REVERSED and this matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. §405(g). Clerk is directed to enter f inal judgment in favor of the Plaintiff, remanding this case to the Commissioner under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further administrative proceedings consistent with the concerns raised in the Report and Recommendation. Pursuant to B ergen, proceedings on attorney fees under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), are stayed until the matter is fully adjudicated upon remand. The Plaintiff shall file a motion to award fees under § 406(b) within thirty (30) days afte r counsel receives notice from the Commissioner as to the Plaintiffs past due benefits. This stay relates only to attorney fee proceedings under § 406(b) of the Social Security Act, and not to attorney fee proceedings under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, the latter of which may be adjudicated at this time. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 4/20/2015. (jws)
February 20, 2015	Filing 22 ORDER adopting in part, rejecting in part 20 Report and Recommendations - This matter is recommitted to the Magistrate Judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)with instructions to consider and explain with specificity whether the A LJ sufficiently explained with particularity the weight accorded to the opinion of Dr. Chodosh and the reasons therefor. If the Magistrate Judge finds that the ALJ failed to satisfy this standard, the Magistrate Judge shall consider and explain with specificity whether such error was harmless. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 2/20/2015. (jws)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 20, 2015

Filing 27 ORDER ADOPTING 26 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - Decision of the Commissioner, denying benefits, is REVERSED and this matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. §405(g). Clerk is directed to enter f inal judgment in favor of the Plaintiff, remanding this case to the Commissioner under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further administrative proceedings consistent with the concerns raised in the Report and Recommendation. Pursuant to B ergen, proceedings on attorney fees under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), are stayed until the matter is fully adjudicated upon remand. The Plaintiff shall file a motion to award fees under § 406(b) within thirty (30) days afte r counsel receives notice from the Commissioner as to the Plaintiffs past due benefits. This stay relates only to attorney fee proceedings under § 406(b) of the Social Security Act, and not to attorney fee proceedings under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, the latter of which may be adjudicated at this time. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 4/20/2015. (jws)

February 20, 2015

Filing 22 ORDER adopting in part, rejecting in part 20 Report and Recommendations - This matter is recommitted to the Magistrate Judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)with instructions to consider and explain with specificity whether the A LJ sufficiently explained with particularity the weight accorded to the opinion of Dr. Chodosh and the reasons therefor. If the Magistrate Judge finds that the ALJ failed to satisfy this standard, the Magistrate Judge shall consider and explain with specificity whether such error was harmless. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 2/20/2015. (jws)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SHAFFER v. COLVIN
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: CAROLYN COLVIN
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: WILLIAM LEE SHAFFER
Represented By:	ELIZABETH STAKENBORG
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?