SULLIVAN v. POSTMASTER GENERAL
Plaintiff: KEVIN C SULLIVAN
Defendant: POSTMASTER GENERAL
Case Number: 1:2015cv00080
Filed: April 24, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Office: Gainesville Office
County: Alachua
Presiding Judge: MARK E WALKER
Presiding Judge: GARY R JONES
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 29, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING 10 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ; denying 7 MOTION to Remand to State Court (titled: Dear US District Court Clerk Office). Signed by JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 6/28/2015. This cause is remanded to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. (kdm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SULLIVAN v. POSTMASTER GENERAL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: POSTMASTER GENERAL
Represented By: JONATHAN DOUGLAS LETZRING
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: KEVIN C SULLIVAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?