THERVE v. US IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT

Respondent: US IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
Petitioner: JEAN THERVE
Case Number: 4:2012cv00028
Filed: January 18, 2012
Court: Florida Northern District Court
Office: Tallahassee Office
County: Leon
Presiding Judge: STEPHAN P MICKLE
Referring Judge: WILLIAM C SHERRILL
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: 28:2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 30, 2012 10 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and transferring case to Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals pursuant to the REAL ID Act of 2005, 8 U.S.C. Section 1252 signed by SENIOR JUDGE STEPHAN P MICKLE on 3/30/12. (tss)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: THERVE v. US IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: US IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: JEAN THERVE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.