HARRIS v. TAYLOR COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT

Justia Dockets & Filings Eleventh Circuit Florida Northern District HARRIS v. TAYLOR COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT

HARRIS v. TAYLOR COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT

Plaintiff:	KIM L HARRIS
Defendant:	TAYLOR COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Case Number:	4:2013cv00171
Filed:	April 1, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Office:	Tallahassee Office
County:	Taylor
Presiding Judge:	ROBERT L HINKLE
Presiding Judge:	CHARLES A STAMPELOS
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action:	29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Jury Demanded By:	Both

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 18, 2014	Filing 58 ORDER ON THE MOTIONS ADDRESSED AT THE PRETRIAL CONFERENCE - DENIED 49 Defendants motion to strike the plaintiff's claims for equitable relief; GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART 43 Defendant's MOTION in Limine to ex clude statements made after the plaintiff's termination on November 7,2011; DENIED 24 Defendant's MOTION for Summary Judgment; GRANTED 42 Defendant's MOTION in Limine to Exclude Evidence of Alleged Threatening Behavior by Student� 39;s Parent; DENIED 46 Plaintiff's MOTION in Limine to exclude Testimony Related to the Murder of Plaintiff's Boyfriend; DENIED 39 Defendant's MOTION in Limine to Exclude Evidence and Argument About Economic Damages; GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART 36 Defendant's MOTION to Strike Plaintiff's Affidavit; GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART 37 Defendant's MOTION in Limine to exclude evidence of racial discrimination; GRANTED 38 Defendant's MOTION in Limine to exclude opinions of lay witnesses. Signed by JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE on 3/18/2014. (dlt)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 18, 2014

Filing 58 ORDER ON THE MOTIONS ADDRESSED AT THE PRETRIAL CONFERENCE - DENIED 49 Defendants motion to strike the plaintiff's claims for equitable relief; GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART 43 Defendant's MOTION in Limine to ex clude statements made after the plaintiff's termination on November 7,2011; DENIED 24 Defendant's MOTION for Summary Judgment; GRANTED 42 Defendant's MOTION in Limine to Exclude Evidence of Alleged Threatening Behavior by Student� 39;s Parent; DENIED 46 Plaintiff's MOTION in Limine to exclude Testimony Related to the Murder of Plaintiff's Boyfriend; DENIED 39 Defendant's MOTION in Limine to Exclude Evidence and Argument About Economic Damages; GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART 36 Defendant's MOTION to Strike Plaintiff's Affidavit; GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART 37 Defendant's MOTION in Limine to exclude evidence of racial discrimination; GRANTED 38 Defendant's MOTION in Limine to exclude opinions of lay witnesses. Signed by JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE on 3/18/2014. (dlt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HARRIS v. TAYLOR COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: TAYLOR COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: KIM L HARRIS
Represented By:	CHARLOTTE ROSE FERNEE
Represented By:	MARIE A MATTOX
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?