MAGPUL INDUSTRIES CORP v. GOTTLIEB et al
| MAGPUL INDUSTRIES CORP |
| RUDY'S RA1 ACCESSORIES, MATTHEW GOTTLIEB and DOES |
| 4:2013cv00439 |
| August 8, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| Tallahassee Office |
| Leon |
| MARK E WALKER |
| CHARLES A STAMPELOS |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
43
ORDER FOR DISMISSAL re 41 Joint Stipulation indicating that this case has been settled. The clerk must enter judgment stating, "The parties are ordered to comply with their settlement agreement. The court reserves jurisdiction to enforce the order to comply with the settlement agreement. All claims in this case are voluntarily dismissed with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41." Signed by JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 1/7/2014. (dlt)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER TO FILE ANSWER OR NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT - (Internal deadline for referral to judge if Notice of settlement or answer to complaint not filed earlier: 1/8/2014 before 5:00 p.m..) Signed by JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 1/3/2014. (dlt)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT - ACCEPTED 38 Stipulation filed by MATTHEW GOTTLIEB, RUDY'S RA1 ACCESSORIES. (Internal deadline for referral to judge if response to complaint if no settlement reached not filed earlier: 12/23/2013).). Signed by JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 12/2/2013. (dlt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
