PETRANO v. POLSTON
Plaintiff: DAVID FRANK PETRANO
Defendant: RICKY POLSTON
Case Number: 4:2014cv00374
Filed: July 15, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Office: Tallahassee Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: ROBERT L HINKLE
Presiding Judge: CHARLES A STAMPELOS
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 20, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER OF DISMISSAL - The 39 report and recommendation is ACCEPTED. The motion to dismiss, ECF No. 31 , is GRANTED. The clerk must enter judgment stating, "The complaint is dismissed with prejudice." The clerk must close the file. Signed by JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE on 8/20/2015. (tdl)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PETRANO v. POLSTON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DAVID FRANK PETRANO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RICKY POLSTON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?