FENTON v. SECTION 893.135 FLORIDA STATUTES
Plaintiff: CASWELL FENTON
Defendant: SECTION 893.135 FLORIDA STATUTES
Case Number: 4:2014cv00641
Filed: November 26, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Office: Tallahassee Office
County: De Soto
Presiding Judge: ROBERT L HINKLE
Presiding Judge: CHARLES A STAMPELOS
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 15, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER OF DISMISSAL: The amended report and recommendation 12 is ACCEPTED and adopted as the courts opinion. The clerk must enter judgment and close the file. Signed by JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE on 6/15/15. (amm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: FENTON v. SECTION 893.135 FLORIDA STATUTES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CASWELL FENTON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SECTION 893.135 FLORIDA STATUTES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?