HILL v. STATE OF FLORIDA
Petitioner: TROY HILL
Respondent: STATE OF FLORIDA
Case Number: 4:2014cv00652
Filed: December 5, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Office: Tallahassee Office
County: Wakulla
Presiding Judge: MARK E WALKER
Presiding Judge: CHARLES J KAHN
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 2, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT ANDRECOMMENDATION: The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted as this Courts opinion. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, The petition for writ of habeas corpus, ECF No. 1 , is DISMISSED without prejudice." The Clerk shall close thefile. Signed by JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 2/2/2015. (dac)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HILL v. STATE OF FLORIDA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: TROY HILL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: STATE OF FLORIDA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?