Taylor v. Bodnar Enterprises, Inc. et al

Plaintiff: William L. Taylor
Defendant: Bodnar Enterprises, Inc. and Clemdor Enterprises, Inc.
Case Number: 0:2013cv60975
Filed: April 26, 2013
Court: Florida Southern District Court
Office: Ft Lauderdale Office
County: Broward
Presiding Judge: William P. Dimitrouleas
Referring Judge: Lurana S. Snow
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: None

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Taylor v. Bodnar Enterprises, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William L. Taylor
Represented By: Douglas Steven Schapiro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bodnar Enterprises, Inc.
Represented By: William Glenn Dill, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Clemdor Enterprises, Inc.
Represented By: William Glenn Dill, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.