United States of America v. THIRTY NINE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED DOLLARS (39,900.00) IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY.
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: THIRTY NINE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED DOLLARS (39,900.00) IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY.
Case Number: 0:2014cv62273
Filed: October 3, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Office: Ft Lauderdale Office
County: Broward
Presiding Judge: William P. Dimitrouleas
Presiding Judge: Lurana S. Snow
Nature of Suit: Drug Related Seizure of Property
Cause of Action: 21 U.S.C. ยง 0881
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. THIRTY NINE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED DOLLARS (39,900.00) IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: Roger W Powell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: THIRTY NINE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED DOLLARS (39,900.00) IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY.
Represented By: David William Macey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?