Bankfirst v. Karp
Plaintiff: Bankfirst
Defendant: Kobi Karp
Case Number: 1:2008cv22519
Filed: September 11, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Office: Negotiable Instrument Office
County: Miami-Dade
Presiding Judge: MARGARET J. KRAVCHUK
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 244 ORDER denying 110 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 111 Motion for Leave to File; denying 173 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 175 Motion to Compel; overruling 210 Appeal/Objection of Magistrate Judge Order to District Court; granting 224 Motion to Strike; denying as moot 242 Motion for Hearing. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr on 7/30/2014. (rss)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bankfirst v. Karp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bankfirst
Represented By: James B. Sowka
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kobi Karp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?