Chavez v. Mercantil Commercebank, N.A.
Case Number: 1:2010cv23244
Filed: September 8, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Office: Miami Office
Presiding Judge:
Nature of Suit: Banks and Banking
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 9, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 215 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 189 Motion for Attorney Fees; denying 208 Supplemental Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres on 1/9/2015. (EGT)
May 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 182 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND FINAL JUDGMENT in favor of Roger Chavez against Mercantil Commercebank, N.A. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres on 5/23/2014. (EGT)
November 1, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 106 ORDER granting 73 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying as moot 78 Sealed Motion to Strike Affirmative Defense upon the entry of judgment for Defendant. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres on 11/1/2011. (EGT)
March 28, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER granting 33 Defendant's Motion to Compel Discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrea M. Simonton on 3/28/2011. (mmn)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chavez v. Mercantil Commercebank, N.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?