St. Lucie Jewelry, Inc. v. Jewelry Management Services, LLC et al

Plaintiff: St. Lucie Jewelry, Inc.
Defendant: Jewelry Management Services, LLC and Walter Johnston
Case Number: 2:2013cv14149
Filed: April 15, 2013
Court: Florida Southern District Court
Office: Ft Pierce Office
County: St. Lucie
Presiding Judge: Donald L. Graham
Referring Judge: Frank J. Lynch
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: St. Lucie Jewelry, Inc. v. Jewelry Management Services, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: St. Lucie Jewelry, Inc.
Represented By: Stuart Mitchell Address
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jewelry Management Services, LLC
Represented By: Paige Hardy Gillman
Represented By: Scott W. Konopka
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Walter Johnston
Represented By: Paige Hardy Gillman
Represented By: Scott W. Konopka
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.