Greenberg et al v. Rullan et al
| Fred Greenberg and Timber Ridge, Inc. |
| Luis Rullan and Luis Rullan, Sr. |
| 9:2014cv81191 |
| September 20, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| West Palm Beach Office |
| Palm Beach |
| James M. Hopkins |
| Daniel T. K. Hurley |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
OPINION ORDER granting 12 Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration. Case is reopened and stayed pending the close of Rullan v. Goden and all related appeals. Signed by Judge Daniel T. K. Hurley on 1/7/15. (lr)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO TRANSFER, DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR REMAND, DISMISSING ACTION AND CLOSING CASE. Motions terminated: 9 Plaintiff's MOTION to Stay All Proceedings Pending This Court's Decision on P laintiff's Motion for Remand filed by Fred Greenberg, Timber Ridge, Inc., 8 Plaintiff's MOTION to Remand to State Court and Incorporated Memorandum of Law filed by Fred Greenberg, Timber Ridge, Inc.. Signed by Judge Da niel T. K. Hurley on 10/24/14. (lr) NOTICE: If there are sealed documents in this case, they may be unsealed after 1 year or as directed by Court Order, unless they have been designated to be permanently sealed. See Local Rule 5.4 and Administrative Order 2014-69.
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
