Sanchez v. TakeCare Insurance Company, Inc., a Guam Corporation

Plaintiff: Carol M. Hinkle Sanchez
Defendant: TakeCare Insurance Company, Inc., a Guam Corporation
Case Number: 1:2009cv00001
Filed: January 5, 2009
Court: Guam District Court
Office: Insurance Office
County: Guam
Presiding Judge: Frances M. Tydingco-Gatewood
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 13, 2010 63 Opinion or Order of the Court Opinion and Order Re: Defendant's 38 Motion for Summary Judgment. The court hereby grants the Defendant's motion. Signed by Chief Judge Frances M. Tydingco-Gatewood on 12/13/2010. (fad, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Guam District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sanchez v. TakeCare Insurance Company, Inc., a Guam Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carol M. Hinkle Sanchez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TakeCare Insurance Company, Inc., a Guam Corporation
Represented By: Randall Todd W. Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.