United States of America v. Tract 16309, Lot 213 of Project 935-45 Located on AP 551-111-10 Together with an Und 1/11 Int in Lot 213, Orange, CA, Census Tract/Block 524.17/3, aka 20 Bombay, Irvine, CA
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Tract 16309, Lot 213 of Project 935-45 Located on AP 551-111-10 Together with an Und 1/11 Int in Lot 213, Orange, CA, Census Tract/Block 524.17/3, aka 20 Bombay, Irvine, CA
Claimant: Roland Ho, Ronson Ho, Ryan Ho and Betsy Pik Chee Tang Ho
Case Number: 1:2011cv00004
Filed: March 16, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Guam
Office: Hagatna Office
County: Guam
Presiding Judge: Frances M. Tydingco-Gatewood
Presiding Judge: Joaquin V.E. Manibusan
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 7, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 69 Order granting in part 30 Motion for Sanctions. The court orders the Government to pay a sanction of $2,500.00. Said sanction shall be paid to counsel for the Ho Children Claimants no later than 30 days from the date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joaquin V.E. Manibusan, Jr on 3/7/2012. (fad, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Guam District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. Tract 16309, Lot 213 of Project 935-45 Located on AP 551-111-10 Together with an Und 1/11 Int in Lot 213, Orange, CA, Census Tract/Block 524.17/3, aka 20 Bombay, Irvine, CA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: Karon Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tract 16309, Lot 213 of Project 935-45 Located on AP 551-111-10 Together with an Und 1/11 Int in Lot 213, Orange, CA, Census Tract/Block 524.17/3, aka 20 Bombay, Irvine, CA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Claimant: Roland Ho
Represented By: Joseph C. Razzano
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Claimant: Ronson Ho
Represented By: Joseph C. Razzano
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Claimant: Ryan Ho
Represented By: Joseph C. Razzano
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Claimant: Betsy Pik Chee Tang Ho
Represented By: F. Randall Cunliffe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?