Castro v. Pimental et al
| Leah Castro |
| Debra Pimental, Ted Choy Foo, State of Hawaii, Hawaii Department of Public Safety, Mark Patterson and Nolan Espinda |
| 1:2007cv00558 |
| November 8, 2007 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| Honolulu |
| KEVIN S.C. CHANG |
| DAVID ALAN EZRA |
| P.I.: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
423
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART THE REMAINING DEFENDANTS' 405 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING THE REMAINING DEFENDANTS' 404 MOTION FOR STAY OF ACTION: "On the basis of the foregoing, the Remaining Defendants& #039; Motion for Summary Judgment, filed June 8, 2012, is HEREBY GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED as to: 1) the portion of Plaintiff's negligence claim alleging that Defendants Marks and Wakabayashi, in their individual capacities, were negligent in training, supervising, and retaining Defendants Melchor, Bhalang, Bradley, and Yasunaga; 2) the portion of Plaintiff's negligence claim alleging an NIED claim based on negligent training, superv ision, and retention by Defendants Marks and Wakabayashi, in their individual capacities; and 3) the portions of Plaintiff's § 1983 claim and IIED claim based on the training, supervision, and retention by Defendants Marks and Wakabayashi. The Remaining Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE in all other respects.Further, the Remaining Defendants' Motion for Stay of Action, also filed June 8, 2012, is HEREBY GRANTED. The Court HEREBY STAYS the ins tant case pending the resolution of the appeal in the State Action, Leah Castro, et al. v. Leroy Melchor, et al., Civil No. 08-1-0901-05 KTN. IT IS SO ORDERED." Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on September 14, 2012. (bbb, )< hr>CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
|
Filing
378
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR STAY OF ACTION PENDING APPEAL re 294 : Case stayed.. Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E KOBAYASHI on 1/7/11. (eps ) -- foregoing, Motion for Stay of Action Pending Appeal, filed December 16, 2010, i s HEREBY GRANTED. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
|
Filing
271
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT re: 246 . Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E KOBAYASHI on 11/15/2010. [The instant Order supercedes the Court's October 29, 2010 Minute Order, do c no. 265 . Minutes of Motion Hearing - doc no. 264 ] (afc)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
