Peabody v. State of Hawaii
Plaintiff: State of Hawaii
Defendant: George Gary Peabody
Case Number: 1:2008cv00481
Filed: October 24, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Hawaii
Office: Civil Rights: Other Office
County: Honolulu
Presiding Judge: KEVIN S.C. CHANG
Presiding Judge: HELEN GILLMOR
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 14, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER ADOPTING 6 MAGISTRATE'S FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATION. Signed by Chief JUDGE HELEN GILLMOR on April 14, 2009. (bbb, )
March 13, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 6 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE 1 . Signed by JUDGE KEVIN S.C. CHANG on 3/13/2009. (afc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Peabody v. State of Hawaii
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: George Gary Peabody
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: State of Hawaii
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?