Skyson USA, LLC v. United States of America et al
||Skyson USA, LLC
||United States of America, United States Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service and Doe Defendants 1-10
||June 17, 2009
||Hawaii District Court
||J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT
||BARRY M. KURREN
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||05:702 Administrative Procedure Act
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|August 13, 2009
EP:Hearing held on Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Injunction. The Court DENIES Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Injunction; a written order will follow.The parties shall also notify the Court by August 31, 2009 regarding how they wish to proceed with this action.(JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT)(edm, )No COS issued for this docket entry
|February 22, 2010
ORDER REVERSING FINAL AGENCY DECISION: "the Court REVERSES the Final Agency Decision that Skyson violated the Food Stamp Act and that it be permanently disqualified from participating in SNAP. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in Skyson's favor and against the United States." Signed by Magistrate Judge BARRY M. KURREN on February 22, 2010. (bbb, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.