McNally v. University of Hawaii et al
Kathleen McNally |
University of Hawaii, Rose Tseng, Keith Miser, Bill Chen, Luoluo Hong and Alyson Y. Kakugawa-Leong |
1:2009cv00363 |
August 7, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
Hawaii Office |
Honolulu |
KEVIN S.C. CHANG |
J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT |
Plaintiff |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex) |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 109 ORDER DENYING "MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL" 108 - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 2/10/11. (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry |
Filing 103 ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO CONTINUE; ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF'S EXPERT; ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 38 ; 40 ; 70 ; 75 ; 92 - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 1/28/11. (The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment against McNally and in favor of Defendants.) (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.