Rodenhurst et al v. Bank of America et al
| Luckie L. Rodenhurst and Roxanne Craig-Rodenhurst |
| Bank of America, BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and Does 1 through 20 |
| 1:2010cv00167 |
| March 23, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| UNASSIGNED |
| LESLIE E KOBAYASHI |
| Fraud or Truth-In-Lending |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 Truth in Lending |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
54
ORDER GRANTING 42 DEFENDANTS' BANK OF AMERICA, HSBC BANK USA, N.A., AND BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS' SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT: "On the basis of the foregoing, Defendants Bank of America, former ly known as Countrywide Home Loans Inc., HSBC Bank USA, N.A., and BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint, filed on May 12, 2011, is HEREBY GRANTED. The claims against Defendants Bank of America , formerly known as Countrywide Home Loans Inc., HSBC Bank USA, N.A., and BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS SO ORDERED." Signed by District JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on September 30, 2011. (bbb, )< hr>CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION'S 25 MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT: "On the basis of the foregoing, Defendant BofA's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, filed December 13, 2011, is HEREBY GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows: 1. Because leave to amend would be futile, Counts I, II, and III are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to DefendantBofA; 2. Counts IV, V, VI, VII, IX and X are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 3. If Plaintiffs elect to file a Second Amended Complaint, they must plead their causes of action against the proper defendants and corporate entities, and under the proper theories. The Court ORDERS Plaintiffs to file their SecondAmended Complaint by April 20, 2011. The Court CAUTIONS Plaintiffs that, if they do not file a Second Amended Complaint by April 20, 2011, the Court will dismiss Counts IV, V, VI, VII, IX and X against Defendant BofA with prejudi ce.IT IS SO ORDERED." Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on February 23, 2011. (bbb, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
