Baqui v. Burlington Insurance Company, The
| Richard A. Baqui, II |
| Burlington Insurance Company, The |
| Richard A. Baqui, II |
| Burlington Insurance Company, The |
| 1:2010cv00774 |
| December 30, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| Honolulu |
| LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI |
| BARRY M. KURREN |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S 8 MOTION TO REMAND TO STATE COURT IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT BURLINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY'S NOTICE OF REMOVAL FILED ON DECEMBER 30, 2010: "On the basis of the foregoing, Plaintiff's Motion toRemand to State Court in Opposition to Defendant Burlington Insurance Company's Notice of Removal Filed on December 30, 2010, filed January 14, 2011, is HEREBY GRANTED. This action is HEREBY REMANDED to the Circuit Court of the First Circuit, State of Hawai'i for consideration by Judge Karl K. Sakamoto, pursuant to the Stipulation and Order Severing Claims, filed December 16, 2010. IT IS SO ORDERED.". Signed by District JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on March 31, 2011. (bbb, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
