Dilley et al v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. et al
Chester A.K. Dilley and The Chester Dilley Sr. Revocable Trust dated October 14, 1993 |
Does 1-50, Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., Countrywide Financial Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and The Bank Of New York Mellon |
1:2011cv00168 |
March 14, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
Hawaii Office |
Honolulu |
DAVID ALAN EZRA |
BARRY M. KURREN |
Antitrust |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 ORDER: (1) GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT 6 AND (2) DISMISSING THE COMPLAINT AS TO ALL DEFENDANTS WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Excerpt of Order: ~ "The Complaint is...DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as against all De fendants in this action with leave to amend no later than thirty (30) days from the filing of this Order. Failure to do so and to cure the pleading deficiencies will result in dismissal of this action with prejudice." ~ Signed by JUDGE DA VID ALAN EZRA on 9/13/2011. [Order follows hearing held 9/12/2011 on Motion to Dismiss 6 . Minutes: docket entry no. 20 ] (afc) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.