International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, District Lodge 141 v. Hawaiian Airlines
Plaintiff: International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, District Lodge 141
Defendant: Hawaiian Airlines
Counter_claimant: Hawaiian Airlines
Counter_defendant: International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, District Lodge 141
Case Number: 1:2011cv00271
Filed: April 25, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Hawaii
Office: Hawaii Office
County: Honolulu
Presiding Judge: LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI
Presiding Judge: RICHARD L. PUGLISI
Nature of Suit: Railway Labor Act
Cause of Action: 45 U.S.C. ยง 151
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 25, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S 26 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING DEFENDANT'S 28 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT: "On the basis of the foregoing, Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment, filed October 11, 2011, is HEREBY GRANTED. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, filed October 11, 2011, is HEREBY DENIED. The Court REMANDS the matter to the Arbitrator for clarification and interpretation of the Original Award in a manner consistent with this Order. The Clerk is DI RECTED to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff on the Complaint and Counterclaim. IT IS SO ORDERED." Signed by District JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on January 25, 2012. (bbb, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipant s registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, District Lodge 141 v. Hawaiian Airlines
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hawaiian Airlines
Represented By: William N. Ota
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_claimant: Hawaiian Airlines
Represented By: William N. Ota
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_defendant: International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, District Lodge 141
Represented By: Pamela D. Chandran
Represented By: Ira L. Gottlieb
Represented By: Stefan M. Reinke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, District Lodge 141
Represented By: Stefan M. Reinke
Represented By: Ira L. Gottlieb
Represented By: Pamela D. Chandran
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?